How Do You Know Box Office Mojo
Why do some movies neglect and others brand millions? The reasons vary from film to film, simply one thing is certain. Information technology doesn't matter if a movie has an enormous budget, expert marketing and the hottest actors in Hollywood. The audience decides if a movie is worth the price of admission.
When a movie flops at the box part, information technology creates a financial ripple effect that is felt from the distributor to the producer. Hollywood has produced more than duds than hits over the years. Let's accept a look at the biggest box office bombs in the history of the business.
The Wolfman (2010) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$lxxx,000,000
The audiences in 2010 had werewolf fever. Unfortunately, this more traditional story of an American man getting attacked past a werewolf and transforming into one didn't win over audiences like the Twilight series.
The movie had a stellar cast of A-listers, including Benicio del Toro, Emily Blunt and Anthony Hopkins, only even they couldn't save it from box part blunder. It didn't make dorsum the $150 one thousand thousand budget and was greeted with mixed reviews. On the bright side, it eventually turned into a cult classic, making information technology a little more than successful than most of the other movies on our list.
Every year, studios release a movie hoping to win large at the Oscars. Windtalkers tells the story of two U.S. Marines sent to protect Navajo Marines who used their unwritten native language to communicate safely on military radios. It's based on an incredible truthful story, and it should take qualified as an American movie classic.
The motion picture received negative criticism for its clichéd war scenes and its lack of focus on the Native American actors in comparing to the screen time given to star Nicolas Cage. In the end, this film didn't go the accolades the creators expected.
Tomorrowland (2015) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$150,000,000
This aggressive sci-fi picture stars George Clooney equally a former boy-wonder who has always had a passion for scientific discipline and invention. Every bit an adult, he teams upwards with a agreeing, curious young girl, played by Britt Robertson. They work together to explore the mysteries of fourth dimension and space. Somewhen, the squad ends upward somewhere they idea but existed in their minds.
Information technology sounds intriguing, simply audiences and critics weren't interested, and it didn't come across box office expectations. In fact, it only received a 50% approval score on Rotten Tomatoes, not because information technology was boring, but because information technology had too much going on.
Ability Rangers (2017) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000
The latest installment in the popular Ability Rangers franchise was supposed to be one of the biggest movies of 2017. It was a revival of every '90'south child'due south favorite show, and it featured autistic and LGBTQ actors, a first for a superhero movie.
Sadly, the picture'southward progressive casting and special effects didn't plough this pic into the blockbuster the creators predictable. Critics cited tonal inconsistencies, and audiences plainly just weren't interested in a modernized adaptation of the story. In the terminate, Power Rangers ended upwards being one of the biggest flops of the unabridged yr.
How Do You Know (2010) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$105,000,000
Everyone loves a good former-fashioned rom-com, right? That was the idea behind How Exercise You Know? The motion picture stars America'due south sweetheart Reese Witherspoon, who plays a woman who just got cut from the U.S.A. women'southward softball team.
As if that'due south not enough, she gets caught in a honey triangle with her electric current pro ball swain (Owen Wilson) and a corporate do-gooder played by the affable Paul Rudd. The connection betwixt her career and beloved troubles is weak, and many critics said the movie lacked a functional plot. In the end, no one wanted to encounter this confusing, get-nowhere movie.
Sahara (2005) – Estimated Loss: $78,000,000–$100,000,000
Movie adaptations of books often turn into instant classics or become some of the biggest bombs in the film industry — Sahara fits into the latter category. The movie didn't do a keen job of telling the story in Clive Cussler'southward bestselling novel, and movie-goers didn't like it.
This comedy-activeness picture show didn't exercise well with viewers, who constitute the chemical science betwixt Matthew McConaughey and Penelope Cruz to exist not-existent. The overall script lacked originality, and the movie didn't fare well with critics either. Even though it was visually highly-seasoned, the dazzler of the Sahara desert couldn't rescue this failure of a movie.
Gods of Arab republic of egypt (2016) – Estimated Loss: $79,000,000–$90,000,000
When volition Hollywood realize they can't produce Egyptian-themed movies with primarily white casts anymore? You lot would think they would know by now that audiences don't similar information technology, and Gods of Egypt was no exception. If anything, this movie taught everyone a long overdue lesson on the importance of accurate representation.
The flick received tons of backfire over the casting — enough for Lionsgate and director Alex Proyas to event an apology for the casting gaffe. That wasn't the only problem critics found with the movie, yet. They too ripped it to shreds for its lackluster interim, boring script and overuse of special effects.
The Man from U.Due north.C.L.Due east. (2015) – Estimated Loss: $80,000,000
Directed by fan favorite Guy Ritchie, this movie was based on the popular 1960'southward TV testify. The rights to the show were purchased all the mode back in 1994, but numerous rewrites delayed the moving picture'due south product, and it wasn't released until 2015.
All that time spent trying to get the script just correct didn't pay off, unfortunately. Based on the motion-picture show'south weak box role performance, information technology may take even done more damage than skillful. Even with actors who were at the elevation of their game, like Henry Cavill, The Homo from U.N.C.L.E. received mixed reviews from critics and failed to attract an audience.
Fantastic Four (2015) – Estimated Loss: $lxxx,000,000–$100,000,000
In the last 20 years, the world has enjoyed a alluvion of superhero movies, and the genre has turned into a highly profitable Hollywood commodity. Even remakes of memorable favorites have fared well — until the Fantastic Four. The latest accommodation of Curiosity's first family unit did non win over fans.
This reimagined version of the famous comic actually angered many longtime fans because of its wildly dissimilar storyline. Other than the acting, which received mixed reviews, critics and viewers weren't impressed and called the picture show cheesy, uninteresting and predictable. To add insult to injury, the film just has a meager ix% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Ouch!
Bract Runner 2049 (2017) – Estimated Loss: $80,000,000
In some cases, even movies with skillful reviews tin bomb. This follow-up to the original '80's Blade Runner is a good example of that. Blade Runner 2049 had a stellar cast, including Harrison Ford and Ryan Gosling, impressive art direction and Oscar-winning photography. It was well-received by critics and fans and accomplished an 87% blessing rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
None of these things seemed to help the moving picture'southward performance at the box role. It underperformed and concluded up costing the studio millions of dollars. Many people speculate that the lengthy run-time of 163 minutes was probably more time than nigh people wanted to spend in a theater.
Supernova (2000) – Estimated Loss: $83,000,000
Is there a term for a picture that underperforms so spectacularly that "bomb" doesn't fifty-fifty do information technology justice? If so, then Supernova definitely falls into that category. The moving-picture show had a $ninety million production upkeep but just grossed $14.8 million, making it one of the biggest losses in Hollywood history.
This movie not only failed to fill movie seats, but it also got scathing reviews. To appointment, it only has a score of 19% on Rotten Tomatoes. Sci-fi fans everywhere consider it to be a joke because of its lack of excitement, confusing storyline and mediocre special effects.
Valerian and the City of a K Planets (2017) – Estimated Loss: $84,000,000
Valerian and the City of a K Planets seemed to have a lot going for it prior to its debut. The movie had an A-list bandage with British stars Clive Owen and Cara Delevingne, neat marketing and a high production upkeep, simply all of these things concluded upwardly working against it.
The cost of advertizement and production really price then much that information technology didn't turn much of a turn a profit, fifty-fifty with decent attendance numbers. Even though it wasn't the worst moving-picture show ever fabricated, the reviews were mixed, which didn't aid its crusade. The movie just has a 43% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Town & Country (2001) – Estimated Loss: $85,000,000
Boondocks & Country has earned a reputation as one of the worst movies always fabricated. The Hollywood Reporter even went and so far every bit to list it as the fifth-biggest bomb of the 2000s. The movie had a star-studded ensemble cast that included Warren Beatty, Diane Keaton, Gary Shandling and Goldie Hawn, but that wasn't enough to win over audiences.
Critics and movie-goers akin found the plot to be confusing, the characters unlikeable and the editing to be confusingly bad. In the end, it only grossed $x.4 million and has a beggarly thirteen% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, making information technology a depression point in the careers of everyone involved.
Treasure Planet (2002) – Estimated Loss: $85,000,000
This animated take on the classic Robert Louis Stevenson novel Treasure Island proves that sometimes it's best to leave a fourth dimension-honored story alone. Even though information technology was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Animated Feature, it wasn't well-received by most critics, and audiences didn't give information technology the fourth dimension of day, either.
Everyone agreed that the animation was stunning and visually impressive, but the story was considered weak. One tough critic, A.O. Scott, fifty-fifty called it a "brainless, mechanical pic." On the other mitt, for those who did encounter it, the moving-picture show currently has a 69% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Seventh Son (2014) – Estimated Loss: $85,000,000
Critics didn't seem to care for this fantasy film that was based on the famous novel The Spook's Apprentice. Many blamed the lack of imagination and an overload of special effects for making information technology one of the near deadening flops of 2014. It's 1 you might not even remember hearing about, as it most seemed to disappear overnight.
The just saving grace of the flick was its stars, including Jeff Bridges and Julianne Moore, but even they couldn't do much to help. The movie ended up losing tens of millions of dollars and has since been forgotten forth with the rest of Hollywood'due south bombs.
Pan (2015) – Estimated Loss: $86,000,000–$150,000,000
Peter Pan is ane of the about famous, love children'due south stories in the world, simply that didn't make people want to see the 2015 alive action film Pan. The latest in nearly a dozen film adaptations of the archetype story, the moving-picture show was criticized for its reliance on CGI and its unimaginative storytelling.
Also the weak script and the overuse of special furnishings, an exuberant amount of money was spent on marketing for the film. In addition to the already huge budget of $150 1000000, $100-$125 million was spent on advertizing lonely, putting the flick in a financial hole.
A Contraction in Time (2018) – Estimated Loss: $86,000,000–$186,000,000
When information technology comes to picture show making, appetite is a good affair, but sometimes movies are likewise ambitious for their own practiced. A Wrinkle in Time is a perfect example of that. The long-awaited motion picture adaptation of the famous volume failed to win audiences over and added to the already long list of failed books-turned-movies.
Critics felt it was a visual masterpiece but also thought creators bit off more than they could chew. Even strong performances from famous faces like Oprah Winfrey, Reese Witherspoon, Chris Pino as well as newcomer Storm Reid couldn't create the same captivating magic the book had.
Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) – Estimated Loss: $86,000,000–$106,000,000
This fantastical, modern take on a childhood classic isn't the biggest flop on the list, only it didn't turn out to exist a moneymaker for the studio. This CGI-heavy picture directed by Bryan Vocalizer got a mixed bag when it came to its reception, with audiences and critics disagreeing on its merits.
On Rotten Tomatoes, the motion-picture show scored a measly 53% with a lot of viewers calling it boring, unnecessary and predictable. Some critics, however, felt the movie was action-packed and entertaining. Hollywood Reporter critic Todd McCarthy even said the picture was improve than The Hobbit.
Jupiter Ascending (2015) – Estimated Loss: $87,000,000–$120,000,000
Unfortunately, the only thing people seemed to like well-nigh Jupiter Ascending was the beautiful special effects, and that wasn't plenty to save it from losing large time at the box office. At the time, people were already inundated with infinite movies, and this moving-picture show didn't accept a potent plenty story to compete.
The Wachowski-directed space fantasy simply grossed $47 million in the U.South. and got negative reviews from critics. Despite adequately original and novel globe-building, some professionals reviewing the pic said the script was "breathless." Audiences didn't seem impressed either, and the movie currently has a 27% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Ascent of the Guardians (2012) – Estimated Loss: $93,000,000
This i is another disappointing example of a picture show accommodation gone incorrect. Rise of the Guardians, released in 2012, is an animated adaptation of the popular children'due south book The Guardians of Babyhood. Sadly, having a well-told story already laid out doesn't guarantee moving-picture show success.
Ascension of the Guardians failed to practise the original story justice and ended up wasting a ton of money on marketing. This combination didn't pay off in the long-run, and the studio lost around $93 million. At to the lowest degree kids seemed to like it, and many reviewers on Rotten Tomatoes gave it a positive review for this reason.
Evan Almighty (2007) – Estimated Loss: $88,000,000
This follow-upwardly to Bruce Almighty didn't exactly friction match its predecessor's success — nowhere near it, really. The picture is often regarded as one of the worst sequels of all fourth dimension. Critics complained that, different the first movie, Evan Almighty was a movie that had too many special effects and offered besides few laughs.
Fans of the original were put off by the almost preachy tone of the sequel, and information technology only received a 23% blessing rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Jim Carrey has a reputation for bailing on sequels to his movies. In this case, information technology looks like he made a wise choice.
Cutthroat Island (1995) – Estimated Loss: $89,000,000
Cutthroat Island didn't win big at the box office, but information technology did win the Guinness World Tape championship for World's Largest Box Office Flop. Fortunately, Guinness did away with that record, simply information technology doesn't alter the fact that this was one of the biggest bombs in Hollywood. It stood unchallenged for years equally the biggest blackness mark on the box office.
The endless problems on prepare and with production were the main causes for this movie's failure. In fact, the movie did then poorly that pirate movies were essentially forbidden in Hollywood for years until the success of Pirates of the Caribbean area changed all that.
R.I.P.D. (2013) – Estimated Loss: $91,000,000–$115,000,000
Who would have thought you could go wrong with an activeness-comedy starring anybody's favorite heartthrob Ryan Reynolds and the iconic Jeff Bridges? Well, plain, R.I.P.D. is proof you can. Despite the box office entreatment of Reynolds, this movie couldn't manage to fill theaters.
It'south based on the pop comic book but simply doesn't compare to the actual comic, and fans were left disappointed. The concept didn't seem to resonate with audiences, who found the movie to be goofy and downright awful. That would explain the 13% Rotten Tomatoes approval rating.
The Promise (2016) – Estimated Loss: $94,000,000–$102,000,000
The Promise tells the story of a love triangle between a brilliant medical student, a beautiful young woman and her current beau, all set in the celebrated days of the Ottoman Empire. The creators might have been hoping for an Oscar nomination or even a win, but it didn't happen with this anticlimactic film.
The story wasn't terrible, simply it wasn't impressive, which may be the reason backside the movie's dismal performance with audiences and critics. Christian Bale and Oscar Isaac are known for their incredible interim skills, but even their talent couldn't get people to watch this movie.
The Alamo (2004) – Estimated Loss: $94,000,000
In Hollywood, remakes can exist pretty risky when producers are upwards confronting the success and expectations established by the original. The 2004 version of The Alamo is ane case of a failed remake. This pic had a lot of things working against its potential for success.
For one, it was filmed on one of the largest sets in Due north America, which added to its already staggering budget. The previews weren't well received, which delayed the release. Once it was released, it had to compete with The Passion of the Christ. Basically, this moving-picture show didn't stand a gamble.
Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within (2001) – Estimated Loss: $94,000,000
The popular Final Fantasy series has proven to be one of the most successful, longest-running video game franchises in history, but all that market goodwill didn't show helpful when Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within was released in theaters. The movie was ambitious and visually impressive, but that was near it.
The studio hoped the listen-blowing animation and big-name actors like Alec Baldwin providing phonation talent would exist enough to brand more than the $137 million budget, but they didn't. The detailed graphics had never been seen before, but audiences and critics still found the characters to be strong and unrealistic.
The Lone Ranger (2013) – Estimated Loss: $95,000,000–$190,000,000
After the international success of the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise, Disney idea they could utilise Johnny Depp's star ability to bring in some more large bucks. Unfortunately, they chose the wrong project considering The Lone Ranger was a huge flop.
The movie's massive production and marketing budgets failed to draw audiences in to sentinel the picture show. Despite nearly unmarried-handedly reviving the swashbuckling genre, Depp failed to do the same with the epic western. It probably didn't help that many people who watched it were more than a picayune irked to come across a white guy playing a Native American character, but the weak story gets virtually of the blame.
The Mummy (2017) – Estimated Loss: $95,000,000
Afterwards the massive success of the Brendan Fraser trilogy, producers likely saw more box office gold to be mined from the Mummy franchise. But did this series really need some other reboot? After watching this 2017 version, the answer is "no." Even Tom Prowl couldn't relieve this disaster of a pic, and it ended upward getting pulled from 800 theaters after three weeks.
What was the crusade of the laughable turnout? Deadline Hollywood blamed information technology on "blockbuster fatigue," saying that audiences were burned out on activity-packed movies with tons of CGI. Information technology was intended to launch a Dark Universe franchise for Universal, simply those plans were scrapped.
The Adventures of Pluto Nash (2002) – Estimated Loss: $96,000,000
Building on an already legendary career in standup comedy, Eddie Irish potato became one of the biggest comedic motion picture stars in the '80s and '90s. All of that came to a screeching halt with the release of 2002's forgettable The Adventures of Pluto Nash.
Murphy played an interstellar nightclub possessor who is trying to keep his concern out of the easily of infinite-age gangsters. As much as people honey infinite movies, audiences and critics weren't feeling this ridiculous plot, and it showed in the dismal box office performance. The movie only brought in a puny $seven meg, a tiny fraction of its $100 1000000 budget.
Mars Needs Moms (2011) – Estimated Loss: $100,000,000–$144,000,000
Mars Needs Moms might exist ane of Disney's biggest blunders. Information technology had a classic problem with overspending, which explains the $150 million dollar budget. In addition to the enormous production upkeep, the studio spent $25 one thousand thousand on advertisement. This fabricated it nearly impossible for Pixar to profit, which they didn't.
Expenses weren't the only problem, however. No ane seemed to like the movie, mostly due to its creepy hyper-realistic blitheness. It got terrible reviews and currently has a 37% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. If y'all missed this i when it came out, the but value is for a blench-watch.
Source: https://www.ask.com/entertainment/biggest-box-office-bombs-hollywood-history?utm_content=params%3Ao%3D740004%26ad%3DdirN%26qo%3DserpIndex
0 Response to "How Do You Know Box Office Mojo"
Post a Comment